FEED

TropIKA

Malaria: is elimination a useful concept?

16 Dec 2009

Posted by: Paul Chinnock - Editorial Team

Comments (1)

Can we hope to eliminate malaria as a public health problem? ‘Elimination’, in this context, would mean the interruption of disease transmission, creating zero incidence of locally contracted cases. Or is it more realistic to think in terms of improved control and reductions in case numbers?

The issue is hotly debated. A short Lancet Editorial reports the recent comments of Nick White at the UK Academy of Medical Sciences’ annual international health lecture. He believes that there is now an opportunity to eliminate malaria in many parts of the world. He made reference to the Malaria Elimination Group’s efforts to identify countries where national or subnational elimination strategies could deliver zero transmission.

But at the same meeting another leading malaria specialist, Kevin Marsh said that focusing on elimination could be harmful by causing false hopes.

Comments

  1. OYEWUMI T J Says:

    Malaria has its positive role in life, especially in terms of food web and chain. So, in order not to break the chain, we should not eradicate malaria but control it.

Leave a Reply

Categories
TropIKA Blogs
Recent Commented Posts
Blog Archives
December 2009
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031